Some people might be able to cheat the fee by developing a game for a few years using the free version, then paying for one $10 monthly subscription in order to publish it. Now, if you want anyone else to play your game, you have to pay a monthly or annual fee.
They used to offer a base-level permanent license that allowed you to publish to desktop, and that license would go on sale regularly throughout the year. … Actually, this sounds better than it really is. You can now try the engine completely for free! You only have to pay if you want to publish. Unity has a completely free option that limits you in ways most hobbyists would never notice, but GMS2 always required a paid license to use more than a few sprites or scripts-and the limitations hit even harder after the big changes in the recent 2.3 release.īut just this morning I got an email: GameMaker Studio is changing its pricing model. However, as I sit here saying it’s the obvious choice, it’s always been difficult to try out GMS2 to see if it really works for you. But if you want to make a retro pixel platformer, GameMaker Studio 2 is the obvious choice. Unity is the main pick for 3D development, and it’s brought in better 2D tools in recent years, with a focus on high-quality, animation-style graphics.
There’s really no shortage of game development engines, but even so, there’s two that get the most attention from “serious” indie developers: Unity and GameMaker Studio 2 (sorry Unreal Engine). Don’t know how to program? Construct can help with that! Want to make a REALLY simple 2D game? PICO-8 has you covered! Not sure if you want 2D or 3D? Try Godot. Want to make a simple 2D game? LÖVE is a great option. We’re living in a golden age of indie development.
0 kommentar(er)
